5G Network: 5G "is safe", new scientific guidelines say

The international body spends seven years mulling over the evidence

New international guidelines say the frequencies won't to power 5G services are safe, disputing claims by campaigners that next-generation networks represent a threat to public health.

The International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has been performing on new guidance for the past seven years and says the new recommendations provide improved protection for humans exposed to radio electromagnetic fields (EMF).

The previous “conservative” guidelines had been devised in 1998 and therefore the ICNIRP said they might still are adequate for 5G. However, it adds that updated guidance will provide additional assurances. the most changes concern frequencies above 6Hz – airwaves which will be wont to power high capacity 5G.

5G frequencies

“We know parts of the community are concerned about the security of 5G and that we hope the updated guidelines will help put people comfortable,” said ICNIRP Chairman Dr. Eric van Rongen. “The guidelines are developed after a radical review of all relevant scientific literature, scientific workshops, and an extensive public consultation process. they supply protection against all scientifically substantiated adverse health effects thanks to EMF exposure within the 100 kHz to 300 GHz range.”

Other changes from the 1998 document are that the new guidance contains specific provisions for whole or partial body exposure and for limited exposure. the rules also include greater transparency to form the logic and scientific basis of the findings easier to speak.

“The most vital thing for people to recollect is that 5G technologies won't be ready to cause harm when these new guidelines are adhered to,” added van Rongen.”

The advice of the ICNIRP echoes those of UK regulator Ofcom, whose latest round of spectrum testing shows that 5G networks don't pose a health risk to the general public.

It remains to be seen whether anti-5G campaigners are going to be convinced by the findings given the apparent disregard for other academic and scientific studies. Campaigners argue the upper band frequencies and denser specification of 5G mean that radiation is going to be amplified.

They argue this may end in a variety of health problems, like concern, and have urged local authorities and operators to cease rollout until further tests are conducted. this is often despite the very fact that the whole body of research available refutes these claims, while the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations are that 5G is safe.

There have also been instances of disinformation and faux news. In the UK, charity Electrosensitivity-UK ran a campaign within the summer of last year, depicting a family holding hands with the caption “How safe is 5G?”. The poster included quotes from professionals claiming 5G caused reduced fertility, depression, disturbed sleep, headaches, and cancer.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned the advert, ruling the claims couldn't be supported by scientific evidence.

source